The online \"Caspio Bridge Help Documentation\" appears to be incorrect in its description of how the reference an \"Autonumber\" field as a parameter - at least in cases where the \"Autonumber\" is generated in a WebForm datapage.
The online help states that
AutoNumber parameters are automatically named [@InsertFieldName], where “FieldName†is the name of your AutoNumber field.
Thus, if your field name was \"foo\", then the receiving parameter would be [@Insertfoo].
However, it appears that the receiving parameter ACTUALLY should be named [@InsertRecordfoo].
Would it be possible for Caspio to update the official online documentation to reflect this change?
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
Question
hollberg
The online \"Caspio Bridge Help Documentation\" appears to be incorrect in its description of how the reference an \"Autonumber\" field as a parameter - at least in cases where the \"Autonumber\" is generated in a WebForm datapage.
The online help states that
Thus, if your field name was \"foo\", then the receiving parameter would be [@Insertfoo].
However, it appears that the receiving parameter ACTUALLY should be named [@InsertRecordfoo].
Would it be possible for Caspio to update the official online documentation to reflect this change?
Thanks,
Mitch Hollberg
Morrison Analytics
Link to comment
Share on other sites
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.